Page 64 - GALENIKA MEDICAL JOURNAL
P. 64

pratiti bolesnike duži vremenski period i obuhvatiti veći broj ispitanika, kako bi se definisali korelati
          i adekvatni terapijski modaliteti. Svakako je preporuka da se u narednim ispitivanjima bolesnici
          sa istim tipom bola, podjele u jasno definisane grupe, kako bi se adekvatno procijenio terapijski
          uspjeh određenog preparata u kupiranju bola. Za ljekare kliničare je najvažnije da bi trebalo misliti
          o bolu kao simptomu kod bolesnika sa GBS koji bi trebalo adekvatno tretirati, kako bi se poboljšao
          kvalitet života oboljelih. Zato je preporučljivo koristiti specifične upitnike za prepoznavanje kvaliteta
          i kvantiteta bola u svakodnevnoj kliničkoj praksi, kako pri dijagnostikovanju, tako i prilikom
          dugotrajnog praćenja bolesnika sa GBS.





          Abstract

          Immune-mediated neuropathies, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), represent a heterogeneous group of disorders
          caused by a loss of immune tolerance to antigens of peripheral nerves or surrounding blood vessels. Clinically, GBS is
          characterized by the development of symmetrical muscle weakness over up to four weeks, accompanied by sensory
          disturbances and dysautonomia. Pain is a common symptom of GBS, but unfortunately, it is often overlooked. Pain should
          be viewed multidimensionally, and the biopsychosocial model is currently widely accepted. Pain assessment is conducted
          using various unidimensional, multidimensional, and specialized scales to detect the neuropathic component of pain.
          Regarding pain as the first symptom of the disease, previous studies have shown that this is the case in about 70% of
          patients. Pain in GBS patients has both neuropathic and nociceptive components. A previous study conducted on GBS
          patients in our population found that the prevalence of pain in the acute phase was 85.5%, and neuropathic pain was
          present in 26.4% of cases. Rare studies have shown that after the acute phase of the disease, pain decreases, but sensitive
          neuropathic elements such as paresthesias/dysesthesias often remain. It is also assumed that pain plays a significant
          role in worsening depression and anxiety, as well as negatively impacting the quality of life and sleep in GBS patients.
          Pain management in GBS involves both specific (Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy, IVIG, and/or Therapeutic Plasma
          Exchanges, TPE) and nonspecific treatment methods (supportive therapy), as well as the use of analgesics and co-analgesics
          based on the principles of treating pain syndromes, depending on the assumed pathophysiological mechanism. After the
          acute phase of the disease, special attention is given to physical rehabilitation treatment and psychosocial support for the
          patient. Therefore, the involvement of other specialists (physiatrist, psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, and pain medicine
          specialist) is of crucial importance for adequate pain management.

          Keywords: neuropathy, Guillian-Barre syndrome, pain, quality of life





          Literatura                                         8.  Tham SL, Prasad K, Umapathi T. Guillain-Barré syndrome mimics. Brain
                                                                Behav. 2018 Apr 10;8(5):e00960.
                                                             9.  Verboon C, van Doorn PA, Jacobs BC. Treatment dilemmas in Guillain-
          1.  Kieseier BC, Mathey EK, Sommer C, Hartung HP. Immune-mediated   Barré syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;88(4):346-52.
             neuropathies. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Oct 11;4(1):31.
                                                             10.  Liu S, Dong C, Ubogu EE. Immunotherapy of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
          2.  Stojanov A, Berisavac I, Bozovic I, Arsenijevic M, Lukic-Rajic S, Petrovic   Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2568-79.
             M, et al. Incidence and mortality rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome in
             Serbia. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2020 Dec;25(4):350-5.  11.  Van Koningsveld R, Schmitz PI, Meché FG, Visser LH, Meulstee J, van
                                                                Doorn PA. Dutch GBS study group. Effect of methylprednisolone
          3.  Shahrizaila N, Lehmann HC, Kuwabara S. Guillain-Barré syndrome.   when added to standard treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin
             Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1214-28.            for Guillain-Barré syndrome: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 Jan
          4.  Van den Berg B, Walgaard C, Drenthen J, Fokke C, Jacobs BC, van Doorn   17;363(9404):192-6.
             PA. Guillain-Barré syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and   12.  Walgaard C, Lingsma HF, Ruts L, van Doorn PA, Steyerberg EW, Jacobs
             prognosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Aug;10(8):469-82.   BC. Early recognition of poor prognosis in Guillain-Barre syndrome.
          5.  Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ. Guillain-Barré syndrome and variants.   Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):968-75.
             Neurol Clin. 2013 May;31(2):491-510.            13.  Wen P, Wang L, Liu H, Gong L, Ji H, Wu H, et al. Risk factors for the
          6.  Shang P, Zhu M, Wang Y, Zheng X, Wu X, Zhu J, et al. Axonal variants of   severity of Guillain-Barré syndrome and predictors of short-term
             Guillain-Barré syndrome: an update. J Neurol. 2021 Jul;268(7):2402-19.  prognosis of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun
                                                                2;11(1):11578.
          7.  Van Doorn PA. Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Guillain-Barré
             syndrome (GBS). Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 2):e193-201.  14.  Bendinger T, Plunkett N. Measurement in pain medicine. BJA Education.
                                                                2016;16(9):310-5.


          62     DOI: 10.5937/Galmed2411053S
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69